Skip to content

Evidence

We measure what we claim.

Every year we interview our partners, survey our learners, and assess competence before and after every course. This page is built from that data — including its limits.

143

organisations supported

34

countries reached

799

people trained & certified by LEAD

209407

km² protected, by teams we develop and support

How we know

Three streams of evidence, every year.

Stream 1

Partner interviews

Senior management of every recently trained organisation, interviewed 6–12 months after the intervention: did it meet their needs, what changed, what stalled.

Stream 2

Learner surveys

Individual learners, 6–24 months post-course: skills applied in real incidents, confidence over time, in-house training delivered.

Stream 3

Competency assessment

Pre- and post-course measurement on every course: what learners could do before, and what they can demonstrably do after.

Honesty about limits: our samples are small and learner selection is not random — the full reports say so explicitly, alongside methodology and raw outcomes. Ask us for them; we share them in full.

What the evidence shows

Four findings that matter.

25

Lives saved, documented

25 first-aid interventions by learners in 2025 — snake bites, buffalo attacks, road accidents, gunshot wounds. Every known outcome: survival. Zero reported incidents of incorrect technique.

“I attended a boy bitten by a red spitting cobra and managed to apply a snake bandage. The boy survived the poison [sic] effects.” — learner, Kenya

66→100%

Independence, in one year

The share of surveyed partners running their own in-house training rose from 66% to 100%. One Kenyan partner has trained 90% of its entire ranger workforce with its own instructors.

“The training budget now allows for more. We reallocated toward equipment for rangers and welfare.” — partner organisation

80%

From reactive to proactive

Of analysts surveyed after our problem-solving course, 80% apply all tools in their work — analysing wildlife crime patterns, mapping human-wildlife conflict, and uncovering previously unknown wildlife trade.

“Problem analysis is now a routine step before any field response.” — analyst learner

5 of 6

Communities feel it

Partners reporting direct community benefit: trained first responders within reach, safer coexistence with wildlife, and 13,296 community members and students educated by ranger instructors.

“The communities are more positive toward rangers. There is a better relationship.” — partner organisation

A ranger treating a casualty during a field drill.
Confiscated snares, Way Kambas National Park.
85%

less snaring across 1,300 km² — within one year

LEAD-mentored teams applied the Integrated Threat Reduction framework at the preventive tier: understanding who set snares and why, then changing the conditions that made snaring worthwhile. The photograph is theirs — wire recovered from the forest.

Read the full case study
“Our rangers would not have been able to get to where they are if it were not for the LEAD programme — it has helped them grow and leapfrog beyond their wildest dreams.”
Senior management, partner organisation, Kenya 2025 MEL

Recognition

2× Herman Goldstein Award

International recognition of partners for excellence in problem-oriented policing — applied to conservation.

ASU POP Center resource

Integrated Threat Reduction is listed as a wilderness-problems resource by Arizona State University’s Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.

ANBI certified

Dutch public-benefit status (RSIN 856 268 781) — with the transparency and annual reporting duties that come with it.

Go deeper

Read the full reports, then decide.

The annual Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning report — methodology, sample sizes, limitations, and findings — is available on request.